2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 885 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo S60. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | S60 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2720 mm |