2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (268 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 183 kg more than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | XC90 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2720 mm |