2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2003 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2003 Jaguar XK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 625 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Econoline 2003 Jaguar XK
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Econoline XK
Year Released 2001 2003
Body Type Van Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4194 cc 3996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 197 HP 290 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 1700 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2600 mm