2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2003 Rover 75

To start off, 2003 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2003 Rover 75. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2003 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 850 kg more than 2003 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications: