2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Lincoln Aviator

To start off, 2005 Lincoln Aviator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (302 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Aviator should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 135 kg more than 2005 Lincoln Aviator.

Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (407 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln Aviator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Econoline 2005 Lincoln Aviator
Make Ford Lincoln
Model Econoline Aviator
Year Released 2001 2005
Body Type Van SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4194 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 197 HP 302 HP
Torque 338 Nm 407 Nm
Vehicle Weight 2325 kg 2190 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2890 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]