2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 379 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econoline | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 382 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1946 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2710 mm |