2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2010 Audi A3. (140 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi A3.
Because 2001 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi A3. (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 2010 Audi A3 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Econoline | A3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2578 mm |