2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 BMW X3
To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X3 (240 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 460 kg more than 2012 BMW X3.
Because 2012 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW X3. (299 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 2012 BMW X3 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Econoline | X3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4648 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1881 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1675 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2810 mm |