2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2001 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econoline | Micra |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2449 mm |