2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1948 GAZ M-20
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1948 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1948 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econovan (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1948 GAZ M-20 | |
Make | Ford | GAZ |
Model | Econovan | M-20 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |