2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 211 kg more than 2001 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Hudson |
| Model | Econovan | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3160 mm |
