2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 445 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econovan (155 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900. (140 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
| Make | Ford | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Econovan | 1900 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1953 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1883 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |
