2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 210 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1956 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Econovan | RM A |
Year Released | 2001 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |