2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1959 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1959 Lotus Seven. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1959 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 855 kg more than 1959 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1959 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Econovan | Seven |
Year Released | 2001 | 1959 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2240 mm |