2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 305 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | Econovan | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2190 mm |
