2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 155 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econovan | Cedric |
Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |