2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 150 kg more than 1971 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Rover 2000 (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1971 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Econovan | 2000 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2640 mm |