2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 535 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Econovan (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Econovan | 616 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2480 mm |