2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1973 Rover 2000
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Rover 2000 (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1973 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1973 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Econovan | 2000 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2640 mm |