2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1975 Triumph TR6
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Triumph TR6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Triumph TR6 (104 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Triumph TR6 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 360 kg more than 1975 Triumph TR6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Triumph TR6 (194 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1975 Triumph TR6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1975 Triumph TR6 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Econovan | TR6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1975 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 194 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2240 mm |