2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1985 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,512 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 45 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1985 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Econovan | Sable |
Year Released | 2001 | 1985 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2512 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |