2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1990 Jaguar Kensington
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar Kensington. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar Kensington would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar Kensington is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (295 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar Kensington should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar Kensington (433 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar Kensington will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1990 Jaguar Kensington | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Econovan | Kensington |
Year Released | 2001 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 5344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 433 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |