2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 107 kg more than 1991 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Magna (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan. 1991 Mitsubishi Magna has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1991 Mitsubishi Magna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1991 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econovan | Magna |
Year Released | 2001 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1338 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |