2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 240 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Econovan | Apollo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2610 mm |