2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 595 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Econovan | Pajero |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
