2001 Ford Econovan vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 385 kg more than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econovan | Challenger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |