2001 Ford Econovan vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Econovan | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2790 mm |
