2001 Ford Econovan vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 635 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Econovan | 6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2964 cc |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |