2001 Ford Econovan vs. 2010 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2010 GMC Canyon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Canyon (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 2010 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Econovan | Canyon |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |