2001 Ford Econovan vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (420 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage weights approximately 265 kg more than 2001 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (469 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
| Model | Econovan | Vantage |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7300 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 469 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4382 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2022 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2601 mm |
