2001 Ford Econovan vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (284 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Taurus weights approximately 389 kg more than 2001 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Taurus (344 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan. 2013 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Econovan | Taurus |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1834 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2177 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2868 mm |
