2001 Ford Explorer vs. 1996 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2001 Ford Explorer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2001 Ford Explorer. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Explorer.
Because 1996 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Explorer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Ford Explorer has automatic transmission and 1996 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1996 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Explorer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Explorer | 1996 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Explorer | XJS |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 222 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 82 L |