2001 Ford F-650 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2001 Ford F-650 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford F-650 (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford F-650 weights approximately 368 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 1054 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. 2001 Ford F-650 has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford F-650 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: