2001 Ford F-650 vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2001 Ford F-650 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford F-650 weights approximately 278 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 962 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lotus Elan. (204 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lotus Elan. 2001 Ford F-650 has automatic transmission and 1996 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1996 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford F-650 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford F-650 | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | F-650 | Elan |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7300 cc | 1588 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 1166 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1020 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4930 mm | 2260 mm |
