2001 Ford F-650 vs. 2006 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XK8 (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 436 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jaguar XK8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XK8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 755 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jaguar XK8. (411 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jaguar XK8.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford F-650 | 2006 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-650 | XK8 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7300 cc | 4194 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 1166 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1734 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 4930 mm | 2590 mm |