2001 Ford F-650 vs. 2009 Lincoln Navigator

To start off, 2009 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 679 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Lincoln Navigator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lincoln Navigator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 671 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lincoln Navigator. (495 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lincoln Navigator.

Compare all specifications: