2001 Ford F-650 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford F-650 weights approximately 73 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 984 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (182 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2001 Ford F-650 has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford F-650 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford F-650 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-650 | 3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7300 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 1166 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1225 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4930 mm | 2650 mm |
