2001 Ford F-650 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (181 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford F-650 weights approximately 73 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 926 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford F-650 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | F-650 | C |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7300 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 1166 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1225 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 4930 mm | 2770 mm |