2001 Ford F-650 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 272 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford F-650. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 793 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford F-650 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | F-650 | ATS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7300 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 1166 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4930 mm | 2776 mm |
