2001 Ford F-650 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (306 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1263 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 723 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Tundra. (443 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Tundra.

Compare all specifications: