2001 Ford Falcon vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2001 Ford Falcon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2001 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Falcon weights approximately 965 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Falcon | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Falcon | 16 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 3983 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2260 mm |