2001 Ford Falcon vs. 1992 Jaguar XJS

To start off, 2001 Ford Falcon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 220 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 215 kg more than 2001 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJS (377 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Falcon 1992 Jaguar XJS
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Falcon XJS
Year Released 2001 1992
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3983 cc 3978 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 220 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4750 RPM
Torque 357 Nm 377 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3650 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.3 mm 91 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 102 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1730 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 82 L