2001 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2001 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 357 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Falcon | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | Falcon |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3983 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 59 L |