2001 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Opel Omega

To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 150 kg more than 2001 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Falcon 2002 Opel Omega
Make Ford Opel
Model Falcon Omega
Year Released 2001 2002
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 3983 cc 2197 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 220 HP 142 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 357 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.3 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 94.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1665 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2740 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 75 L