2001 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Falcon weights approximately 5 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (217 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Falcon | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Falcon | Outlander |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3983 cc | 2376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 87.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 59 L |
