2001 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2001 Ford Falcon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Falcon. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Falcon | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Falcon | Calais |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3983 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 357 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |