2001 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2001 Ford Falcon. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Caprice. 2010 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Falcon | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Falcon | Caprice |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3983 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 357 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |