2001 Ford Ka vs. 1984 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2001 Ford Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ka.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ka | 1984 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Ka | Camaro |
Year Released | 2001 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |