2001 Ford Ka vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2001 Ford Ka is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,466 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (91 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 120 kg more than 2001 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Plymouth Colt (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ka | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Ka | Colt |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1466 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2400 mm |