2001 Ford Ka vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Clio (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ka | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | Clio |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |